| To: | Kingsley, Jason (mcb@raderfishman.com) |
| Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78065860 - 2000 AD - 70933-117 |
| Sent: | 11/20/03 1:26:40 PM |
| Sent As: | ECom111 |
| Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
| SERIAL NO: 78/065860 APPLICANT: Kingsley, Jason | |
| CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: JOEL E. BAIR MCGARRY BAIR LLP 171 MONROE AVE NW STE 600 GRAND RAPIDS MI 49503 | RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom111@uspto.gov |
| MARK: 2000 AD | |
| CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 70933-117 CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: mcb@raderfishman.com | Please provide in all correspondence: 1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address. |
Serial Number 78/065860
This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on October 30, 2003. The applicant has deleted its Section 44 basis. Accordingly, the application has been removed from suspension and prosecution of the application may resume.
Registration was refused on the grounds that the applicant failed to provide the Office with an acceptable identification of goods. The applicant’s proposed amended wording of the goods submitted on January 29, 2002 is unacceptable. Accordingly, the refusal to register is hereby made FINAL on the following grounds.
(1) The proposed amended wording “mobile phone games and personal digital assistance” in the identification of goods for International Class 9 is unacceptable as indefinite. Furthermore, it exceeds the scope of the original identification and suggests services. Accordingly, it must be deleted from the identification of goods.
As stated in the Office action dated August 8, 2001, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.
(2) The wording “sound and video recordings and reproduction apparatus; program memory cartridges for electronic amusement apparatus” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant may amend this wording to “sound and video recordings and reproduction apparatus, namely, [list specific goods, e.g., digital audio tape http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h4http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h6recorders, digital video http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h5http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h7recorders]; computer program memory cartridges for electronic amusement apparatus,” if accurate. TMEP §1402.01.
Identification of Goods: International Class 16
The wording “printed matter; printed publications namely, books, manuals, comics, brochures, pamphlets and magazines featuring science fiction and entertainment; photographs; posters; stationery” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant may amend this wording to “Printed publications namely, books, manuals, comics, brochures, pamphlets and magazines featuring science fiction and entertainment; photographs; posters; stationery,” if accurate. TMEP §1402.01.
Identification of Goods: International Class 28
(1) The wording “collectable figurines” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant may amend this wording to “collectable toy figurines made of molded plastic,” if accurate. TMEP §1402.01.
(2) The applicant has classified “trading cards” incorrectly. The applicant must amend the application to classify the goods in International Class 16. 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a) and 1401.03(b).
(3) The wording “electronic table games with electro-optical screen” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant may amend this wording to “arcade-type http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h4http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h6electronic education video http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h5http://atlas.uspto.gov/netacgi/ - h7games,” if accurate. TMEP §1402.01.
The above suggested identifications of goods are acceptable as written. Any alteration may render them unacceptable. Accordingly, if the applicant wishes to amend the goods differently, or if the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
Please further note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.71(a); TMEP § 1402.06. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the original identification.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or (3) filing of a petition to the Director if permitted by 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b). 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §715.01. Regarding petitions to the Director, see 37 C.F.R. §2.146 and TMEP Chapter 1700. If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
/GFosdick/
Geoffrey Fosdick
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 111
(540) 851-0865
ecom111@uspto.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.uspto.gov/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.uspto.gov/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.