To:PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. (tmcentral@pirkeybarber.com)
Subject:U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77734496 - GRIP-RITE SHINGLELAYMENT - PSBP:197US
Sent:8/2/2010 9:11:06 AM
Sent As:ECOM115@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

    APPLICATION SERIAL NO.       77/734496

 

    MARK: GRIP-RITE SHINGLELAYMENT

 

 

        

*77734496*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          SHANNON T. VALE   

          600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2120         

          AUSTIN TX 78701-2973

           

           

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.uspto.gov/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

 

 

    APPLICANT:           PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. 

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          PSBP:197US        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

           tmcentral@pirkeybarber.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 8/2/2010

 

The statement of use has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

Drawing and Specimen Do Not Match

 

The mark on the specimen disagrees with the mark on the drawing.  In this case, the drawing displays the mark as GRIP-RITE SHINGLELAYMENT, while the drawing shows the mark as GRIP RITE SHINGLELAYMENT, without the hyphen between the wording “GRIP” and “RITE”.

 

A statement of use must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services specified in the statement of use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 1109.09(b).  The mark on the drawing must be a substantially exact representation of the mark as used on the specimen.  37 C.F.R. §2.51(b); TMEP §807.12(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b)(1).  In addition, the drawing of the mark can be amended only if the amendment does not materially alter the mark as originally filed.  37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(2), (b)(2); see TMEP §§807.12(a), 807.14 et seq. 

 

Therefore, applicant must submit one of the following:

 

(1)  A new drawing of the mark that agrees with the mark on the specimen but does not materially alter the original mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b); TMEP §§807.13(a), 807.14 et seq.  Amending the drawing to agree with the specimen would not be considered a material alteration of the mark in this case.; or

 

(2)  A substitute specimen showing use in commerce of the mark on the drawing, and the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.”  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.59(b)(2), 2.193(e)(1); TMEP §§807.12(a), 904.05.  If submitting a specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.

 

Pending receipt of a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark and/or service mark.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).

 

Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP §1109.17.

 

Substitute Specimen Required

 

The specimen is not acceptable because, although identified as a point-of-purchase material, it appears to be mere advertising material; it is not accompanied by evidence of point-of-sale presentation.  See In re Ancha Elecs., Inc., 1 USPQ2d 1318, 1319-20 (TTAB 1986); TMEP §904.03(g).  Material that functions merely to tell prospective purchasers about the goods, or to promote the sale of the goods, is not acceptable to show trademark use.  TMEP §904.04(b).  Leaflets, handbills, brochures, advertising circulars and other printed advertising material, while normally acceptable for showing use in connection with services, generally are not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods.  See In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304, 1307 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520, 1522 (TTAB 1993); TMEP §§904.04(b), (c), 1301.04.

 

However, a printed catalog or similar specimen, which is otherwise a form of advertising, is acceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with the goods if it includes (1) a picture of the relevant goods or a textual description that identifies the actual features or inherent characteristics of the goods such that the goods are recognizable, (2) the mark appearing sufficiently near the picture or textual description of the goods so as to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) information necessary to order the goods (e.g., an order form or a phone number, mailing address, or e-mail address for placing orders) or a visible weblink to order the goods.  See In re Sones, 590 F.3d 1282, 1286-89, 93USPQ2d 1118, 1122-24 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re Dell Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725, 1727-29 (TTAB 2004); Lands’ End, Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 513-14, 24 USPQ2d 1314, 1316 (E.D. Va. 1992); TMEP §904.03(h).  Displays associated with the goods that comprise point-of-sale material such as banners, posters, shelf-talkers, window displays, menus, or similar devices are also acceptable specimens to show trademark use.  See In re Bright of Am., Inc., 205 USPQ 63, 71 (TTAB 1979); TMEP §904.03(g). 

 

A statement of use must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods specified in the statement of use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 1109.09(b).  Trademark Act Section 45 requires use of the mark “on the goods or their containers or the displays associated therewith or on the tags or labels affixed thereto.”  15 U.S.C. §1127; see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1); TMEP §§904.03, 904.04(b), (c).

 

Therefore, applicant must satisfy one of the following:

 

(1)        Submit evidence of point-of-sale presentation, such as (a) a photograph, with the mark clearly discernible, showing the specimen used in association with the goods as a point-of-sale display; or (b) a statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, providing sufficient detail to show how the specimen is actually used at the point of sale to link or associate applicant’s mark with the goods.  A mere statement that the specimen is used in connection with the sale of the goods, such as distributed at sales presentations, is not sufficient to meet this requirement.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.61(b), 2.193(e)(1); In re Osterberg, 83 USPQ2d 1220, 1224 (TTAB 2007); In re Drilco Indus., Inc., 15 USPQ2d 1671, 1672 (TTAB 1990); In re Ancha Elecs., 1 USPQ2d at 1319-20; TMEP §904.03(g).; or

 

(2)        Submit a substitute specimen showing proper trademark use of the mark for each class of goods specified in the statement of use, and the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.59(b)(2); TMEP §904.05; see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1).  If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.

 

Examples of specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, or photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.

 

Pending receipt of a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.88(b)(2); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). 

 

Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP §1109.17.

 

Applicant may respond to the stated specimen refusal by submitting a verified substitute specimen by following the suggested directions below for responding either online or by mail. 

 

If applicant responds to this Office action online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), applicant should provide a substitute specimen as follows:  (1) answer “yes” to the TEAS response form wizard question to “submit a new or substitute specimen;” (2) attach a jpg or pdf file of the substitute specimen; (3) select the statement that “The substitute specimen(s) was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.”; and (4) sign personally or enter personally his/her electronic signature and date after the declaration at the end of the TEAS response form.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.59(b)(2), 2.193(a), (c)-(d), (e)(1); TMEP §§611.01(c), 804.01(b).  Please note that these steps appear on different pages of the TEAS response form. 

 

If applicant experiences difficulty in submitting the required substitute specimen, supporting statement and/or declaration, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov for technical assistance regarding the TEAS response form.

 

If applicant responds to this Office action on paper, via regular mail, applicant may provide a verified substitute specimen by personally signing and dating the declaration below, and submitting a substitute specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.59(b)(2), 2.193(a)(1), (d), (e)(1); TMEP §§804.01(b), 904.05.

 

The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

_____________________________

(Signature)

 

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

 

_____________________________

(Date)

 

 

Comments

 

If applicant has questions about the application or this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney at the telephone number below.

 

/April K. Roach/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 115

Phone: (571) 272-1092

 

 

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form at http://teasroa.uspto.gov/roa/.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) at http://tarr.uspto.gov/.  Please keep a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If TARR shows no change for more than six months, call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/teas/eTEASpageE.htm.